Fake Web Traffic: Confusing Outputs with Outcomes

Since about 2005 when pressure began to mount on marketing professionals to prove accountability and ROI, marketers have looked to demonstrate value by measuring. This desire to measure has also caused “track-able” media, such as the web, to become preferred to “impression” media such as newspapers. However, track-able does not mean valuable.

In a recent article in Advertising Age, the author notes that “fake web traffic is worse than you thought,” and may be costing online advertisers millions of dollars in wasted ad impressions.

In today’s world you want to pay for engagement not impressions when possible. YouTube‘s True View program where you only pay if the video is watched completely is a simple example. You can construct other engagement devices as well, but if you are going to pay for outputs, why not buy print media, they are very hungry for your ad spend.

While how much web traffic is actually “fake” and counted is subject to valid debate, if you invest in outcomes, not outputs, it won’t matter.

Mitch

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Advertising, marketing performance management and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s