Troubling expenses or cheap quality control?

I bought a couple items of clothing recently from a major catalog house, and I wasn’t too  pleased with the items.  The shorts, although marketed to adult males, were so baggy that they seemed designed for what, in new York City, they call “yutes”.  The shirt was of a fairly poor quality material.  I did wear, and of course wash, them a couple times, thinking they might improve.  When they didn’t I returned them to the seller.  I felt bad doing so – after all, they couldn’t re-sell worn and washed clothing, but I wasn’t satisfied with them. 

Then it occurred to me that the seller should welcome these returns (and the comments I provided as to why I was returning them).  Returns such as these act as a QC check on their materials, styling, and market research.  I was actually doing them more of a favor by returning them for a full refund than I would have by simply keeping them.

The lesson: feedback (even product returns) is not an expense —  it is invaluable information.  Are you paying attention to all the feedback you are getting (including the expensive, inconvenient,  feedback that you really don’t want to hear)?


This entry was posted in customer satisfaction and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Troubling expenses or cheap quality control?

  1. The primary purpose of your easy to collect upon warranty should be to find out how you are doing. It is much better to have customers complain to you than about you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s